On #ZEC the picture is different and, to me, even cleaner.
Before the impulse up the market spent a long time inside roughly 484–492. The top was tested more than once, but a real break higher took a while.
Then the range finally broke and price quickly ran to 510–520+.
Now I like the classic sequence: accumulation → break of resistance → return to the old range → attempt to continue higher. So 492.17–484.39 is a potential retest zone. What used to cap price from above can start working as support after the break.
Entry: two limits — 492.17 and 484.39. Stop / cancel: 477.63. Potential: around 2.5–20% net. Risk: 1% on the whole idea — 0.5% per limit. Leverage 10–30x, size from risk.
What matters here isn't the touch itself, but how price behaves after it arrives. A return into the range, a hold, and a buyer reaction is a normal retest after a break. If the market comes back down and calmly accepts under the whole old structure, the prior impulse can already look like a failed break. That's why invalidation sits below the range.
Versus PYTH the distance to the zone is much smaller, so this one can activate sooner. Same principle: we don't chase after the impulse, we wait for the place where risk versus potential continuation gets more interesting. Of these two setups I currently like ZEC a bit more on structure purity.
Trade parameters
- Limits /
- Stop
- Risk1% · по 0.5% на лимитку
- Target2.5–20% чистого движения

